I have been thinking of writing on NO ENGINE -an internet search device which will come to the help of millions of people of this world one day. I have had some talks with those soft-ware engineers who are behind the algorithm of NO ENGINE. Recently I asked one of their directors the following question:
"The algorithm differs between engines, which is why different search engines may produce different results for the same query. Each search engine has its niche. It is however not uncommon for a user to use more than one search engine at a time. This further demonstrates the importance for website owners to be indexed and ranked well on all search engines. The aim of a search engine is to put itself in its user's shoes. They therefore want to deliver appropriate, relevant, information-rich sites that will satisfy users, first time round. How you get the websites owners indexed on NoEngine?"
In reply he informs me the following matter which is the content of this blog-posting today.
"The aim of a search engine is to put itself in its user's shoes.”
Some think that, “the importance for website owners to be indexed and ranked well on all search engines". This is a wrong conception held by the most website owners nowadays. After you study and test more, you will find ~money~ is the only way for most search engines to index commercial keywords for web pages. For example, Google won't index the keywords "GPS" to AyAy-Sir.com, no matter how good they follow Google's rule. Some website owners have the same problem for their web pages.
To get the websites owners indexed on a search-engine like No Engine the solution is providing Keyword Submit feature to a webpage owner; this is an old way algorithm but it's 100% reliable and which never misses a keyword of a person who would like to speak keywords for his/her pages. Another way is searching web pages without prejudices. Google is prejudiced since it needs to show profit to its investors, which they do by way of blocking valuable keywords of pages of excellent products of millions of good companies and internet sellers.
Google has announced that it can automatically index good results for people, but it's not true since Google’s results are results from their prejudices. "Automatic index" has its benefits, however it doesn't mean "automatic" is absolutely better than "manual", especially when Google search algorithm is full of prejudices and are meant to drop commercial, freedom and science keywords.
The name of NoEnige is since there is no search engine of trust because search engines index keyword for money. All of them speak louder for people who pay them higher. There is a FAQ- how NoEngine can make money if NoEngine does not follow the ways of other search engines?
Our idea is -if NoEngine can search keywords without prejudices and lies as Google, NoEngine can be much better than Google". Google need trillions dollars profits per year for its overhead, but we're very happy if NoEngine can make millions dollars.
Google has become evil since it has been big as Microsoft. Google must know how to lighten the pockets of millions people of in their business and the way for building an empire.
**For further reading please see what is written in Scobleizer(http://scobleizer.com/2006/02/08/):
February 8, 2006
Why do search engines lie?
Here, do a search for Memetrackers (Google, MSN, Yahoo). Now, why are none of their numbers accurate? Google says there are 713 results, but can only display 62. MSN says there are 101, but only can display 100. Yahoo says there are 368, but only can display 44.
Why aren’t there any truth in advertising laws for search engines?
Update: the numbers are changing. Google now says there are 699 results, but can only display 692 (this is after you tell it to display all duplicates).
Oh, and no engine can display more than about 1,000 results, so if they say there’s 42,000,000 results there’s no way to verify whether those numbers are accurate or not.
Update 2: Yahoo is actually accurate once you tell it to display all duplicates. It says 429 results and displays 429 results. So, Yahoo wins! (although I wish they’d all be a little clearer up front).
