NO ENGINE DEFEATS GOOGLE

There are several search engines in the internet. Yahoo, MSN, Ask Me, Google etc. But generally most people use Google search engine. Google has spread its name through propaganda blitz. Gone are the days when the best known brands are best quality brands. Now a different genre of business has intruded in the internet. This class of internet service providers is not always honest. Google has a good name as a mail-service provider. There is no doubt that the top three mail-service providers are Yahoo, Hotmail and Google. But this is Google’s emphatic front not its core activity. Google-it may be said, spreads itself through various ways and in many areas with the sole aim of earning from advertisement. There’s no harm and nothing bad in earning from advertisement. But when it is done by harming the interests of the internet users-it’s definitely bad and must be protested against.

Google filters and prevents millions of results in its search engine. Firstly, it only shows those results for which they are paid. Secondly, any regular user of search engines may have experienced the fact that Google brings out millions of irrelevant results against a single search. One innocent person wonders at this volume at first. But gradually-if he or she is little alert –may discover the click behind these millions of results. Google does this intentionally as it has to serve its advertisers by opening the false or irrelevant pages where the ads lie. It’s unethical as Google makes the search-engine user a prisoner of innumerable results. One can not check and see ten million results that Google brings in for a single search. Unfortunately-the desired and meaningful results are prevented by Google as it would go against its business. A search with four or five key words should bring the maximum possible rational results. But Google is infinite in its maximum false results.

Those who are professional persons have already realized it. You will go with the search words “Google Evil” or “Freedom from search engine” or say “AyAy Sir INC’ –you will find what Google brings in.

Considering all this, a good organization tried with their own advance algorithm to help people coming out in to the light from the bewildering jungle of sites. It’s a search help. Its name is NO ENGINE.

From the very name one may guess that it functions with a human face. I have written about it in my previous post.

Any person may use No Engine to see it for him/her whether I’m right or not. No Engine still runs on donations and it has no intention to use it as a profiteering tool. For the general people it will take sometime to know about this wonderful helping hand. It has come into existence to help people and for doing that it must reduce the impact of Google from people’s mind. So No Engine now supports Yahoo against Google. Actually, scientifically and mathematically No Engine has already won over Google as it wraps all the contents of Google and Yahoo now. No Engine is far superior to Google also for the following reasons: No Engine is able to:

1. Wrap contents of any search engine.
2. Trace contents of any search engine.
3. Dump contents of any search engine.
4. Modify contents of any search engine.
5. Join contents of any search engine.
6. Improve contents of any search engine.
7. Unite contents of any search engine.

As all search engines in the market provide search results for making money from advertisements-they have the motivational compulsion to limit/block 99% results.

No Engine is not business –it stands for justice-as evident from its name.

So go to the website of No Engine by clicking:

http://www.noengine.com/

Follow the old saying: SEEING IS BELIEVING

winner

Are we carnivores or herbivores-by Nature

Although some historians and anthropologists say that man is historically omnivores, our anatomical equipment ­ teeth, jaws, and digestive system ­ favors a fleshless diet. The American Dietetic Association notes that “most of mankind for most of human history has lived on vegetarian or near-vegetarian diets.”

And much of the world still lives that way. Even on most industrialized countries, the love affair with meat is less than a hundred years old. It started with the refrigerator car and the twentieth-century consumer society. But even with the twentieth century, man’s body hasn’t adapted to eating meat. The prominent Swedish scientist Karl von Linne states, “Man’s structure, external and internal, compared with that of the other animals, shows that fruit and succulent vegetables constitute his natural food.”

Comparison between carnivores, herbivores and humans

When you look at the comparison between herbivores and humans, we compare much more closely to herbivores than meat eating animals. Humans are clearly not designed to digest and ingest meat.

• Meat-eaters: have claws
  Herbivores: no claws
  Humans: no claws

• Meat-eaters: have no skin pores and perspire through the tongue
  Herbivores: perspire through skin pores
  Humans: perspire through skin pores

• Meat-eaters: have sharp front teeth for tearing, with no flat molar teeth for grinding
  Herbivores: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding
  Humans: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding

• Meat-eaters: have intestinal tract that is only 3 times their body length so that rapidly decaying meat can pass through quickly
  Herbivores: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.
  Humans: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.

• Meat-eaters: have strong hydrochloric acid in stomach to digest meat
  Herbivores: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater
  Humans: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater

• Meat-eaters: salivary glands in mouth not needed to pre-digest grains and fruits.
  Herbivores: well-developed salivary glands which are necessary to pre-digest grains and fruits
  Humans: well-developed salivary glands, which are necessary to pre-digest, grains and fruits

• Meat-eaters: have acid saliva with no enzyme ptyalin to pre-digest grains
  Herbivores: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains
  Humans: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains

Based on a chart by A.D. Andrews, Fit Food for Men, (Chicago: American Hygiene Society, 1970)

Clearly if humans were meant to eat meat we wouldn’t have so many crucial ingestive/digestive similarities with animals that are herbivores.

Why do people eat meat?

Many people ask me, “If we weren’t supposed to eat meat than why do we?”. It is because we are conditioned to eat meat. Also, the ADA (American Dietetic Association) tells us that “most of mankind for most of human history has lived on a vegetarian or Lacto-ovo vegetarian diet.

A popular statement that meat eaters say is; “In the wild, animals kill other animals for food. It’s nature.” First of all, we are not in the wild. Secondly, we can easily live without eating meat and killing, not to mention we’d be healthier. And finally, as I have already shown, we weren’t meant to eat meat. Meat and seafood putrefies within 4 hours after consumption and the remnants cling to the walls of the stomach and intestines for 3-4 days or longer than if a person is constipated. Furthermore, the reaction of saliva in humans is more alkaline, whereas in the case of flesh-eating or preying animals, it is clearly acidic. The alkaline saliva does not act properly on meat.

The final point I would like to make on how we as humans were not meant to eat meat is this. All omnivorous and carnivorous animals eat their meat raw. When a lion kills an herbivore for food, it tears right into the stomach area to eat the organs that are filled with blood (nutrients). While eating the stomach, liver, intestine, etc., the lion laps the blood in the process of eating the dead animals flesh. Even bears that are omnivores eat salmon raw. However, eating raw or bloody meat disgust us as humans. Therefore, we must cook it and season it to buffer the taste of flesh.

If a deer is burned in a forest fire, a carnivorous animal will NOT eat its flesh. Even circus lions have to be feed raw meat so that they will not starve to death. If humans were truly meant to eat meat, then we would eat all of our meat raw and bloody. The thought of eating such meat makes one’s stomach turn. This is my point on how we as humans are conditioned to believe that animal flesh is good for us and that we were meant to consume it for survival and health purposes. If we are true carnivores or omnivores, cooking our meat and seasoning it with salt, ketchup, or tabasco sauce would disguise and we as humans would refuse to eat our meat in this form

Blog of the Day Awards