Google

Monday, 21 April 2008


Everybody is talking about the rising prices of food stuffs. The costs of cereals, vegetables, pulses and edible oils have sky rocketed –in so short a period-that experts from all over the world have been profusely offering their opinions as to the probable causes of this tremendously inflationary impulses. The causes –the majority of them believe lie behind mainly two factors. Firstly, it’s the US financial depression with their sub-prime mortgage crisis has created shock waves throughout the world. Secondly, some people think that the rise of oil prices has affected the cost of commodities. As of today the price of petrol is above $60 a barrel. According to some this will continue to go up and will reach approximately $100 by the end of this year. So there will not be any let up in inflationary pressure.

So this is a matter, I think, should better be left to the economists and governments or simply to the process in times with unthought-of situations.

But what one finds at least in India that the prices of consumer goods like electronic gadgets, apparels, jeans, alcohol and hundred other items are not going up. So why is the inflation biased for this area? If we try to discuss a little –we find some ominous signs for the future.

The economic reform started in India not long ago. There were many other countries in Africa and Asia which accepted the principles of economic reform much before India. If we compare China with India we will see that China was much advanced in this matter than India. Perhaps this reform in economic sector was necessary and almost a fait accompli considering the global economic and political conditions. Owing to this economic reform the total number of employments all over the world and especially in India has much increased. So the ability to spend more has helped many persons and consequently the flow of money in the market has increased considerably. In this matter we know that this extra flow of money comes from the same group of persons who did not have the ability to spend almost nothing five years ago. In respect of India’s self sufficiency in food Amartya Sen’s opinion was that a good majority of people in India do not manage square meals a day. Most people are half-fed as they don’t have the money to go to the market for buying food articles. If all of these people went to the market to buy their needed food there would be famine in India. It’s because of some half-fed and un-fed people India are not a famine stricken country and we are able to buy food in reasonable prices. What happens now is that people who were unemployed a few years ago are coming to buy food. Moreover the the overall population has exploded into a figure of 1.13 billion in India. So there has been much demand on food articles. The middle class –whose salary has increased two fold in the last ten years are consuming without caring any control. A regular visitor in the urban markets of India is witness to this fact.

India is seriously in need of increased production of food crops. India, long one of the most productive agricultural regions of the world, could not meet its basic need for food grains during the early years of the nation's independence. The Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s dramatically improved yields in India. With considerable national pride, India boasted that it had achieved not only self-sufficiency in food grains, but had become a grain-exporting nation. In 2006, however, for the first time since the Green Revolution, and in part because of changes in agricultural policy, India had to import wheat. India will again have to import food grains in 2007.Now India has banned food export.

The price of steel is also soaring. In the last ten years there has been boom in the housing sector –which ultimately caused a shortfall of steel supply in the market. The price of crude oil and the future scenario has pushed many countries to produce more bio-fuels. Many governments are giving subsidies to the farmers for cultivating plants for bio-fuel leaving the traditional food production. So there has been shortage of food production in many countries. But India is still not involved in producing bio-fuels.

But there is a danger of which the governments of all the countries must be alert. This is reduction of agriculture land producing food in order to creating SEZ and bio-fuels.

Is production of more cars necessary in India? The more cars mean more oil consumption. To procure oil for these increasing numbers of cars government must have to spend more foreign exchange. How many persons can be employed in a car industry? The car market is thrived in India by the banks. But this industry can wait at least for ten years for increasing the rate of production.

Actually in India the causes of inflation are complicated. Though it can not be seen separately from the international scenario Indian situation should not be compared even with China –the country which follows communist dictatorship. Indian authorities in every field should have a deep insight keeping in mind the phenomena of economic reform-while planning for future. India is still an agricultural country and the majority of her people follow a life style (including food habit) that is in no way similar to those of the developed countries even including countries like Egypt, Brazil etc.

The most unfortunate thing is that India is dangerously lacking an efficient, strong and determined political party and leadership to govern her affairs.

Saturday, 12 April 2008

Will Advani be the next P.M.?


It is desirable that BJP wins the next general election in 2009. I am telling it because no single party or a same alliance should rule a country for more than two consecutive terms in a democracy. Otherwise the ruling party or coalition may be as callous as to be uncaring to the need for betterment and there grow vested interests. In our country no political party is immune to corruption and so the situation becomes worse when the same rulers continue for considerably long time as it has happened in West Bengal. The party or the coalition takes people for granted without any scruple. The UPA government has made a mess in all the major arenas of administration. So if they are given another term it will be disaster for India and democracy. It goes without saying that Rahul Gandhi and the so called babalog will rule the country-only to establish a conception that dynastic rule is better that democracy.

But BJP under L.K. Advani will not be able to snatch power from the present dispensation. Advani unlike Vajpayee does not have an acceptable personality. He is not confident of himself. His remarks on Zinnah are enough to prove that he is not credible. He has recently engage himself to make himself acceptable to people by writing that he was not a party to the decision to handover the terrorists in Kandahar although he was the home minister at that time. What would he want to gain by such statement? It’ll only belittle his party in the eyes of the people. Surely –he has yet to achieve such personality and charm to put Vajpayee in poor light. If his intention is to harm Brajesh Mishra or Jasvant Singh-then it is an exercise to fight with shadows. He should have realized that the main issue of the next election will be the price rise and non-governance.

One of the greatest recent blunders of BJP was not to back APJ Abdul Kalam as their presidential candidate. Mere arithmetical calculation showed that BJP’s nominee had no chance. When defeat was a fait accompli why not standing by a very popular scientist who was also from the minority community! The defeat of Kalam in that case would be a loss of face for Congress for various reasons especially when people were not aware of a name-Prativa Patil. The decision –not to support Kalam as a candidate-must have been backed by Advani.

The gradual eclipsing of Vajpayee from the throne of BJP has been showing its signs. Advani may rouse a religious emotion but he has not that vision and diplomacy to determine a path for the people of as complicated a country as India.

The name of Modi has been made a synonym for maud. The whole press of India and the Congress and its left allies was successful in their propaganda blitz against Modi. But the Congress killed far more Sikhs in Delhi and its surroundings in two days at the instigations of some prominent Congress leaders. It was not a riot. It was genocide. No single bullet was fired from the police against the killers. Advani has been a failure to make people remind of that ghastly act of the Congress after ModI’s victory this year. Advani should have made it a point in this spectacular victory of Modi that Gujratis are not rioters or supporters of riots. This is the failure of Advani. I’m not supporting Modi for his role in that ghastly riot in Gujrat. I am raising the issue only to make a comparison between the two uncivilized incidents and the point of political diplomacy.

Advani should also be more alert about the fact that Indian press in general is more in favour of Ms Sonia Gandhi and the dynasty than they are for Advani.

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

NYTimes.com: Single Mothers in China Forge a Difficult Path

The New York Times E-mail This
This page was sent to you by: debabratahere@yahoo.co.uk

Message from sender:
The world is being complicated

INTERNATIONAL / ASIA PACIFIC | April 6, 2008
Single Mothers in China Forge a Difficult Path
By HOWARD W. FRENCH
China’s single mothers are often marked as social outcasts in a country that still strictly controls population growth and limits the rights of their children.







Tuesday, 1 April 2008

Bhutan, India and democracy

It’s an advantage for the politicians and the media to feign an idea that everything in India happens under democratic rules. They frequently claim that it is the world’s largest democracy to be followed by the US. The general people outside India especially those of the West knew very little of India and do not care to know this country. But those who care know that India is ruled by a democratic government. They do not know that the country is in the hands of some corrupt people, the politicians and the bureaucracy. The election is like a great gamble. The winners are only gainers. So it is an advantage to take part in a gamble by giving it a sacred name.

Here the Congress party’s sole aim to keep the dynastic rule by using this democracy. Actually Congress has long ceased to be a political party. It’s a private enterprise-a particular house. Its present President has been holding this post for the last ten years. Its presidents were the cream of this country in the past. They were people India was proud of giving birth on her soil. But never before, none of them occupied the post of presidency for so long a period. It’s because the party does not represent the people of this country. The party now is a brand name of Nehru-Gandhi family.

Democracy has failed in this sub-continent. Nowhere has it been possible for democracy to find its roots i.e. in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar. Only it’s partially successful in Sri Lanka.

Unfortunately in Bhutan which was so far been ruled by a king has now become a democratic country. The king, Jigme Kesar Namgyal Wangchuk relinquished the kingship and told his people to select their ruler democratically. Nowhere in this world has happened such an incident in the past. People were not happy to accept democracy. They were very happy under monarchy. A study in 2006 ranked Bhutan as the eighth happiest country in the world. The king- Jigme Kesar Namgyal Wangchuk, and his father-the earlier king- Jigme Singye Wangchuk are extraordinary persons as kings. But I do not know whether this happy, peaceful and corruption-less tiny Himalayan country will be able to feel so happy after some years of living in democracy.

So let us compare the two situations in India and Bhutan. Here the Nehru-Gandhi family is hell bent to make Rahul Gandhi to be the next head of the state. And there in Bhutan the King is averse to be the ruler anymore.

Saturday, 29 March 2008

KNOW--NoEngine-the best search device in the world


I have been thinking of writing on NO ENGINE -an internet search device which will come to the help of millions of people of this world one day. I have had some talks with those soft-ware engineers who are behind the algorithm of NO ENGINE. Recently I asked one of their directors the following question:

"The algorithm differs between engines, which is why different search engines may produce different results for the same query. Each search engine has its niche. It is however not uncommon for a user to use more than one search engine at a time. This further demonstrates the importance for website owners to be indexed and ranked well on all search engines. The aim of a search engine is to put itself in its user's shoes. They therefore want to deliver appropriate, relevant, information-rich sites that will satisfy users, first time round. How you get the websites owners indexed on NoEngine?
"
In reply he informs me the following matter which is the content of this blog-posting today.

"The aim of a search engine is to put itself in its user's shoes.”

Some think that, “the importance for website owners to be indexed and ranked well on all search engines". This is a wrong conception held by the most website owners nowadays. After you study and test more, you will find ~money~ is the only way for most search engines to index commercial keywords for web pages. For example, Google won't index the keywords "GPS" to AyAy-Sir.com, no matter how good they follow Google's rule. Some website owners have the same problem for their web pages.

To get the websites owners indexed on a search-engine like No Engine the solution is providing Keyword Submit feature to a webpage owner; this is an old way algorithm but it's 100% reliable and which never misses a keyword of a person who would like to speak keywords for his/her pages. Another way is searching web pages without prejudices. Google is prejudiced since it needs to show profit to its investors, which they do by way of blocking valuable keywords of pages of excellent products of millions of good companies and internet sellers.
Google has announced that it can automatically index good results for people, but it's not true since Google’s results are results from their prejudices. "Automatic index" has its benefits, however it doesn't mean "automatic" is absolutely better than "manual", especially when Google search algorithm is full of prejudices and are meant to drop commercial, freedom and science keywords.
The name of NoEnige is since there is no search engine of trust because search engines index keyword for money. All of them speak louder for people who pay them higher. There is a FAQ- how NoEngine can make money if NoEngine does not follow the ways of other search engines?
Our idea is -if NoEngine can search keywords without prejudices and lies as Google, NoEngine can be much better than Google". Google need trillions dollars profits per year for its overhead, but we're very happy if NoEngine can make millions dollars.
Google has become evil since it has been big as Microsoft. Google must know how to lighten the pockets of millions people of in their business and the way for building an empire.
**For further reading please see what is written in Scobleizer(http://scobleizer.com/2006/02/08/):

February 8, 2006

Why do search engines lie?

Here, do a search for Memetrackers (Google, MSN, Yahoo). Now, why are none of their numbers accurate? Google says there are 713 results, but can only display 62. MSN says there are 101, but only can display 100. Yahoo says there are 368, but only can display 44.

Why aren’t there any truth in advertising laws for search engines?

Update: the numbers are changing. Google now says there are 699 results, but can only display 692 (this is after you tell it to display all duplicates).

Oh, and no engine can display more than about 1,000 results, so if they say there’s 42,000,000 results there’s no way to verify whether those numbers are accurate or not.

Update 2: Yahoo is actually accurate once you tell it to display all duplicates. It says 429 results and displays 429 results. So, Yahoo wins! (although I wish they’d all be a little clearer up front).